Women need men to be strong. Men protect women while they are pregnant and raising children. Men need to be strong, fast, and cunning enough to hunt animals and to fight off other men. This is the natural division of labor between the sexes. The mating process is the selection by women of the superior man, whose genetics will create her child and whose ability will protect it.
To find the strongest man, and to keep him on his toes, women developed the habit of testing men. They have all manner of tools to do this, chief of which are psychological. Most women are capable of absolutely destroying most men if they put their minds to it. Total destruction, however, is not the goal. The two main goals of this habit are the strengthening of men and the reassurance of the woman. If the man fails the test, women have the information needed to either abandon the man or what areas she has to zero in on for improvement. Men who struggle but ultimately pass the test are forced to adapt and grow in the process. Men who pass the test without any trouble reassure the woman and are reminded of what nature’s caprice (embodied in women) has in store for them.
Leftism is the female politics. Rightism (especially when atheist) is male politics. Right-wingers believe in structure, order, dominance, and Truth. Competence and simplicity are the order of the day. The ideal right-wing ideology would make a King out of the best man available and ensure that men of his caliber can rule forever. This, of course, is impossible. Even if such a perfect man existed, he would be easily overpowered by hordes of lesser brutes. In societies where men are submissive and weak, however, that excellent man can gain power over the feminine masses. These societies are only as strong as the man, however. Their virtues have limit and their flaws are amplified. Thus, the practically right-wing society is not a society underneath a benevolent dictator, but one where every man is dictator over himself. When virtue pervades a society that society will inevitably become successful.
Leftism is far more complex than Rightism. This does not make it better. This is because women are infinitely more complicated than men. This does not make them better. It does, however, make them more mysterious and more difficult to understand. Left-wingers are more willing to lie about their intentions. This may partly be because they don’t understand their own intentions, and that they grasp at whatever they can to justify their deeply held goals and beliefs. What are those beliefs? Again, they are complicated. It is easier to simply call them “feminine”. This does not mean weak per se (though weakness is a significant part of the female experience). What it means is more relational than prescriptive.
Women are most easily defined by their contexts, while men are more capable of standing of their own. Men’s purpose is to survive and propagate. Women’s purpose is to oversee this process. Because that process is so inconceivably complicated, women must use primitive instinct to manage it. Men have the luxury of rationality because their concerns are a rung below women’s. This relationship works perfectly well in a primitive setting. But once complexity begins to escalate exponentially (ex. Civilization, Industrialization, Governmental bloat), women’s intuition cannot keep up. They must either learn to be rational or dronish, or they are only useful in the kitchen and the schoolroom. Because of their habit of relying on instinct (almost never dissuaded by personal experience, only by institutional obstacle or nature’s caprice) women are rarely able to become rational in any meaningful sense. There are always exceptions. My favorites are Jane Austen and George Eliot (the most genius women will always be social observers). Modern “free” women are usually of the dronish variety. They do as they are told, believe what they are told, and become extremely frustrated by those who do not do so (especially when they are successful).
Leftism is dominated by woman’s instinct to oversee survival. It is contextual, reacting to the Right-wing order of its time. It is driven by an irrational desire to “test” and to “correct” the Right-wing. When the Left is put down firmly by a competent and survivable Right-wing order, the Left stays down. Why? Because it senses competence and trusts it, like women. But when men become weak, insecurity for societal survivability stabs at its women. This spreads to other men. This insecurity manifests itself in many ugly ways; nihilism, Marxism, Post-Modernism, gender theory, etc. When masculine power fails, society falls back on feminine power. Leftism has always desired the destruction of Right-wing structure; it is necessary for Right-wing structure to renew and revitalize itself. The Right only loses when it is weak.
